“the Muslim Brotherhood started not just depending on the police force for violence, but on their own cadres, and then when they completely adopted a sectarian discourse, inciting against Christians, and then allowing their allies—or allying, aligning themselves with Salafis and jihadis, it just became clear that they’re walking a path that’s going to just lead to the military taking over. And a few of us spent months trying to stop that, either by warning them or by warning those who were supportive of military intervention or by trying desperately to create a more grassroots movement, so that the complications that the Muslim Brotherhood regime was creating would be resolved via, you know, a more genuine, popular approach.”
Assistant Professor, Middle East Political Economy, at the University of Oregon. Currently writing on the Egyptian revolution and the Syrian crisis.
TagsAfghanistan Al Qaeda Anti War Arab Spring Chemical Weapons Civil War Conflict Congress Constitution Crimes Against Humanity Democracy Diplomacy Disarmament Economic Crisis Economy Egypt El Sisi Failed State France Gaza GCC Geopolitics Human Rights Iran Iraq ISIS Islamism Islamists Israel Jordan Justice labour Land Grab Libya Middle East Military Military Action Military Rule Muslim Brotherhood NATO Neocons Neoliberalism Nuclear Deal O'bagy Obama Occupation Opposition Pakistan Palestine Peace Political Economy Protests Qatar Rebels Refugees Regime Change Revolution Russia Saudi Arabia SCAF SNC State State Building Syria Taliban Terrorism Turkey UK UN US Violence War War on Terror Workers Yemen
- 7,365 hits